X-Men: Days of Future Past

Plot: In present day, killer robots have nearly killed off all the X-Men. In desperation, they send Logan/Wolverine (Hugh Jackman) back to the past to prevent the deadly robots from being built. They identify a key event, when Raven/Mystique (Jennifer Lawerence) kills robot inventor Bolivar Trask, and then is captured: her mutant DNA is built into the new robots making them unstoppable.

Logan/Wolverine finds the younger Charles/Prof. X (James McAvoy) and Erik/Magento (Michael Fassbender) and they find Raven/Mystique, but not in time, so they have to improvise. In the end, it is a struggle between the use of force to defend themselves versus the hope for peace -- like previous X-Men stories. [imdb]    [photos]

Review: Good characters with interesting relationships between them,  a suspenseful story, and top special effects. It is a great "Action Movie", and I am glad I saw it.

The best part was the team-oriented fighting scenes as it plays up the cooperation between the characters in the present, and it is punctuated by the terrible death scenes of so many characters -- this amps up the intensity. Even though there are a lot of death scenes, it is comic book action (breathing fire) so the high body count does not seem morbidly gross.

Also tops is the relationship between Charles, Erik, and Logan both with the old actors and the young actors. Very well written. I loved both Charles, but I did not like Michael Fassbender at all. Jennfer Lawrence's character is in many scenes, but often disguised. She did not have too many scenes to show her acting, and she missed a chance at the final climax, but underplayed it. I think it called for tears, or hair-pulling or maybe shape-shifting into a pretzel.

The cast is so big that I only see my favorite characters for a few minutes, and there are teases of so much comic-book backstory.

The music drifts between boring 70's pop and drum-heavy orchestral music -- nothing special here.

A top popcorn movie. Never dull. Often fun and gripping.

Cast: Hugh Jackman, James McAvoy, Jennifer Lawrence, Peter Dinklage, Michael Fassbender; and many many more. 

Directed by: Bryan Singer

Rating: 3.5 stars: Well made. Well acted. Gripping. Extra points for intensity. Misses a perfect score because the societal message is stale, and 2-3 quibbles.

More: They quote Star Trek episode "City of the Edge of Forever" about the rules of time travel, and cleverly have the episode playing in the background. 

Even More: No cameo for Stan Lee, but two of the senators were comic book writers. 

Yet more: In the preview at the end, En Sabah Nur is the other name for X-Men bad guy Apocalypse, who will be in the next X-Men movie called X-Men: Apocalypse. 

Godzilla

Plot: In 1999, there is a disaster at a Japanese nuclear power plant by the sea, very much like the real-life Fukushima Daiichi tsumami disaster in 2011. Ford Brody's (Aaron Taylor-Johnson) parents worked at the plant, and his mother is killed. His father Joe (Bryon Cranston) spends the last 15 years trying to figure out what the Japanese government is hiding. Turns out the disaster was a monster attack, and Joe predicts the monster is coming back.

When the monster does attack, Ford, survives and heads back to the US via Hawaii, but the monster comes too. Ford is a Lieutenant in the Navy, and his wife, Elle (Elizabeth Olsen,) is a nurse in San Francisco. There are additional monsters in the story, and I am not going to spoil the details. It ends with a big battle in San Francisco: Ford is there with a nuke, and the monsters are fighting each other.  Action. Heroics. Smashed Buildings. Cute Children in Peril.  [imdb]    [photos]

Review: The first part of the movie is a shadowy suspense where we don't know what is the horror in the shadows. It is always suspenseful. In the second part, the same characters are witnesses to the action as the monsters journey from Japan to San Francisco -- smashing buildings along the way. 

The special effects are great. The plot is well-written, and we all root for Godzilla to win. Elizabeth Olsen has a small part as Ford's wife, but she does a nice job with facial acting. 

Godzilla is excellent for a monster movie, and I recommend it. Godzilla is fun to watch, and is cool in places. It is a movie for spectacle, and when the film is over -- there isn't much to talk about. Godzilla is not trying to be more than a spectacle. (Monster movies aren't my favorite genre. Godzilla is not a horror movie.)

Cast: Aaron Taylor-Johnson, Elizabeth Olsen

Directed by: Gareth Edwards

Rating: 2.5 stars: The best monster movie since Pacific Rim.

More: Godzilla is a big monster. It is as big as an aircraft carrier. 

Even More: I still like the Blue Oyster Cult song Godzilla, and it final lyric "History shows again and again how nature points up the folly of man."  Seems to fit this movie. 

Draft Day

Plot: Cleveland Browns manager Sonny Weaver (Kevin Costner) has the seventh draft pick, and he wheels and deals to improve his situation. Overlaid on this is his romance with team lawyer Ali (Jennifer Garner), the recent death of the father, and the belligerence from the team's coach Penn (Denis Leary.)[imdb]    [photos]

Review: Draft Day: surprisingly good. The NFL draft has some natural suspense, and the clever script by 

by writers Scott Rothman and Rajiv Joseph sets up Sonny as a hard-working, lovable loser and creates a great climax as the draft plays out. In retrospect it seems so well designed.  

My DW hates football and she liked the movie. Jennifer Garner's role is strong enough to keep her interested -- if fact she liked it much better than last week's Spiderman. 

The conflict between Sonny and Leary's Coach Penn was necessary to ratchet up the tension. 

Naturally, most of the trading is on the phone, and director Reitman has some clever devices to keep the image interesting as we see the people talking. I also liked the images of the stadia (stadiums,) and the draft. He made the draft look much cooler than if probably actually is. 

Cast: Kevin Costner, Jennifer Garner, Denis Leary, many cameos

Directed by: Ivan Reitman

Rating: 2.5 stars: entertaining

 

More: Costner's Sonny is the general manager, and he is screwing team attorney Ali (Gardner.)  Hate to kill the romance, but this is workplace sexual harassment -- a relationship like that can never be consensual. I appreciate that a romance is a good plot device, but in real life, this is a bad idea.  

Even More: No way would those competing coaches make dumb trades like that at the end. 

.

The Amazing Spiderman 2 [3D]

Plot: Peter Parker (Andrew Garfield) and girlfriend Gwen (Emma Stone) graduate from high school as Spiderman helps rescue people and fight minor criminals. Meanwhile former classmate Harry Osborn (Dane DeHaan) learns he is terminally ill, and that research carried out by Peter's father on spiders might be the key. He wants to get some of Spiderman's blood to use as the therapy. Peter says no, and Harry enlists electric-power man Max Dillion (Jamie Foxx) to help him get Spiderman's blood. Gwen comes to battle Max, and Harry shows up to aid Max. After a big fight, buildings are smashed, and people die. [imdb]    [photos]

Review: Amazing Spiderman 2 has a hot beginning with a flashback to Peter's parents running away on a plane -- great action, cool direction, fast pace; the next scene was Spiderman web-slinging among Manhattan skyscrapers in a stylized and unrealistic way. Something was the matter: it was unrealistic in a  comical way -- it really broke the mood. The whole film was like this: excellent scenes mixed with dumb scenes that broke the illusion -- making me realize it was all a movie.

The special effects were a highlight; basically the flying scenes and the fighting scenes were great. I liked all the electricity sparking around. I need to say that Spiderman in his suit was too skinny, and he moved too fast among the skyscrapers, and also his suit was often to bright for the background. Spiderman in costume was always a CGI character, and that didn't always work.

Andrew Garfield is not a strong enough actor to hang a major franchise on. Emma Stone was OK, but if Andrew would have delivered his lines better the whole movie would have been better. Yes, sharper dialog would have helped too, but the core problem was the acting. 

Garfield did not seem sincere enough, always too ironic. The comic relief never helped. (Most superhero movies have comic scenes, but this movie did not mix the comedy with the drama very well.)  I really liked the early scenes of Jamie Foxx -- a vivid character created in a few minutes. 

Good soundtrack: I bought two songs.

Bottom line:  Amazing Spiderman 2 is fun-to-watch. It isn't the greatest, but it is still good. 

Cast: Andrew Garfield, Emma Stone, Jamie Foxx, Dane DeHaan, Sally Field

Directed by: Marc Webb

Rating: 2.0 stars: weakly recommended. 

More: There is a preview of the new X-Men movie embedded in the credits, so don't rush out of the theater.

Even More: Critics complained about similar AS2 is to other Spiderman movies. I didn't have that problem. The originality was good enough.

Yet More: I am tired of the Green Goblin -- happily he is not in the movie very long.

I can't stop: I really liked the Spiderman 3 from 2007. It was one of my favorite movies of the 00's.

.

2012 Top Movies

These are my favorite movies of 2012. The highlight was Cloud Atlas, which I have seen three times.

         4.0 End of Watch

         4.0 Cloud Atlas

         4.0 Lincoln

         3.5+ The Hunger Games

         3.5 The Impossible

         3.5 The Perks of Being a Wallflower

         3.5 The Avengers

         3.5 Silver Linings Playbook

         3.25 Chronicle

Transcendence

In Transcendence the terrorists win. Why?

Plot: Terrorists  blow up computer research centers and assassinate computer genius Will Caster (Johnny Depp.) Evelyn (Rebecca Hall), his wife, desperately uploads his brain into a computer. The disembodied Will disappears into the internet as the terrorists raid this home and shoot up his host computer. Will raises money with high frequency trading, and brings Evelyn to a small town where they build a giant computer with robot medical facilities & solar panels. In time they operate on the town's people fixing their illness, but also getting control over them. The terrorists kidnap and persuade other computer scientists that Will is bad, and they switch sides. This sets up the final battle. [imdb]    [photos]

[SPOILERS - I don't recommend this movie, so I don't feel bad spoiling it.] 

Review: Transcendence gets the end wrong. I don't understand why the Luddites (people who reject technology] win.

Worse, the terrorists win. Not only that, but establishment types switch sides to join them, and the terrorists continue bombing and machine-gunning people to the end. Maybe we are supposed to think that Luddism is a holy cause, but the world without electricity and computers at the end of the movie isn't a utopia:  more likely a famine-plagued planet where people freeze in the winter.

There were good parts, I liked Rebecca Hall's performance. She was a highlight. The images of the computer center are cool as are the dinner scenes with the virtual Johnny Depp. The first 30 minutes is pretty cool as we get the tech set up.

Later in the movie the anti-technology Luddite message takes over, and the movie has a dark, dark ending with Will and Evelyn hugging each other in death.

I am so tired of Morgan Freeman as a scientist in every movie. Go away Morgan Freeman.

Cast: Johnny Depp, Rebecca Hall, Morgan Freeman

Directed by: Wally Pfister

Rating: 1.5 stars: A promising start, but end sucks.

More: Did writer Paglen write the script on a manual typewriter as befits his techno-phobia? 

Even More: If you are going to make a movie where terrorism is justified, you need to try much harder. The moral case for justifiable terrorism is hard to argue  -- it is rather like the argument to torture prisoners -- I suppose Jack Bower on 24 does that all the time. It is not taken seriously enough here. 

.

Noah

SPOILERS -- I assume you know the Bible story, and I am not going to feel bad about spoiling the extra Hollywood subplots here. This is awful movie, and you shouldn't see it. 

Plot: You know the story, God drowns all of humanity except for Noah (Russell Crowe) and the kids. In this version, Noah agonizes about completing human extinction by stabbing to death the fertile females on board. [imdb]    [photos]

Review: Unpleasant. The subplot about killing off the daughters-in-law provided drama but was terrible to watch.

Noah is sincerely told; here the Creator is the ultimate good guy, and the Creator is justified in wiping out humanity. Killing the whole human race is just depressing, and being God's instrument to kill everyone is hard to put a happy face on. I wonder why Noah's wife Ila (Jennifer Connelly) hugs Noah at the end.

Most outrageous was the killing of women and girls; Three offenses: selling girls for cannibalism, Noah letting a potential daughter-in-law get trampled, and Noah's threat to kill his grandchildren but only if they are girls.  The threatened infanticide of girls by our hero, prophet and patriarch, was really hard to watch.  The Bible's Noah story is not misogynist.  (The idea of castrating his sons very came up.)

The acting was good. I really liked Jennifer Connelly (Noah's wfe, Naameh), and Emma Watson (daughter-in-law, Ila) too. The women had reason to cry regarding the outrageous actions of God, Noah, and all the other men including director Aronofsky. Russell Crowe was pretty great too. He looked troubled, but like an old testament patriarch; the role required a hard ass.

There were some good visuals, especially the snakes crawling on the ark, and the Noah's story of Adam & Eve where all the evils of the world are acted out by silhouette figures flashing past in rapid succession.

None of the positives outweighs the unpleasantness of the experience and the monstrousness of the story. It's certainly not a positive faith-building experience. 

Cast: Russell Crowe, Jennifer Connelly, Anthony Hopkins, Emma Watson

Directed by: Darren Aronofsky

Rating: 1.5 stars: Not recommended, despite the good acting. Too monstrous. Not suitable for children

More: Noah leaves you with lots to talk about. 

.